MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4282940342 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055674

Preferences of Australian healthcare providers regarding education on long-term health after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a qualitative study

2022· article· en· W4282940342 on OpenAlexaff
Heike Roth, Veronica Morcos, Lynne M. Roberts, Lisa Hanley, Caroline Homer, Amanda Henry

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilAustralian Government
KeywordsMedicineQualitative researchPregnancyHealth careFamily medicineEpidemiologyAlternative medicineTerm (time)NursingGynecologyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To explore Australian healthcare providers' (HCPs') preferred content, format and access to education regarding long-term health after hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP), in order to guide the development of education programmes. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative study using a framework analysis was undertaken. Registered HCP who were practising in Australia and previously completed a survey about long-term health after HDP were invited to participate. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty HCP were interviewed, including midwives, specialist obstetrician/gynaecologists, general practitioners with a diploma in obstetrics and gynaecology, and cardiologists. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Exploration of preferred content, format and distribution of educational material post-HDP. RESULTS: Twenty HCP were interviewed in April to May 2020. Four main categories were identified. 'Obtaining evidence-based information for own learning' addressing own learning with preference for multi-disciplinary education, preferably endorsed or facilitated by professional organisations. 'Optimising the referral process from hospital to community health services' was about the need for structured long-term follow-up to transition from hospital to community health and align with HDP guidelines. 'Facilitating women's health literacy' addressed the need for evidence-based, print or web-based material to assist risk discussions with women. 'Seizing educational opportunities' addressed the responsibility of all HCP to identify education opportunities to initiate key health discussions with women. CONCLUSIONS: HCP provided ideas on content, format and access of education regarding long-term health post-HDP within the parameters of the Australian healthcare context. This evidence will guide educational developments for HCP on post-HDP health to ensure they can better care for women and families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies→French-language works237,207→