MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4282944250 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-5046

Abstract 5046: DeepTumour: Identify tumor origin from whole genome sequences

2022· article· en· W4282944250 on OpenAlexaff
Lincoln Stein, Wei Jiao, Gurnit Atwal, Quaid Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatinGenomeBiologyMutationGeneticsMutation rateEpigeneticsCancerLineage (genetic)Mutation AccumulationDNAComputational biologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The DeepTumour algorithm predicts the tissue of origin of a tumor based on the pattern of passenger mutations identified by whole genome sequencing. "Passengers" are incidental mutations that accrue in the genome over time due to random mutational processes, and are functionally distinct from the "driver" mutations that are responsible for the cancer's malignant behavior. In adult cancers, passenger mutations typically outnumber drivers by a hundred or thousand-fold; critically, the vast majority of passengers arise in the normal cell lineage that precedes the malignant transformation event and hence reflects mutational processes existing in the cancer's precursor cell and its ancestors. Passenger mutations are not uniformly distributed across the genome, but are concentrated in areas of the genome that have a locally high mutation rate. Mutation rates are highest at places in the genome where chromatin is tightly packed and less accessible to the DNA repair machinery. Each distinct cell type has a different pattern of chromatin packing due to epigenetic modifications. DeepTumour takes advantage of this to infer the chromatin state in the cell of origin from the distribution of passenger mutations in the tumor. Another characteristic of passenger mutations is that the probability of a particular type of mutation occurring (e.g. replacement of C by T) depends on the mutational processes that were active in the cell of origin and its ancestors. Because certain cancers are associated with distinct mutational exposures (e.g. lung cancer and smoking), DeepTumour uses the tumor's distribution of passenger mutation type as well as position on the genome. The DeepTumour algorithm itself is a fully connected, feed-forward neural network which we trained using 28 cohorts representing different tumor types from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes project. When applied to independent sets of tumors, the algorithm is able to achieve an overall accuracy of 88% on primary tumors and 83% on metastatic tumors for distinguishing the 28 cancer types. Furthermore, DeepTumour provides estimates of the models uncertainty, allowing it to automatically detect rare cancer samples with an accuracy of 93%. The DeepTumour algorithm is now available as a fast, convenient and secure web-based service at https://deeptumour.oicr.on.ca. It accepts uploads of VCF files containing somatic mutations from tumor whole genome sequencing, and returns a ranked list of tumor type matches and their relative probabilities. It can be used to provide leads when evaluating a cancer of uncertain primary, to assist in resolving diagnostic ambiguities, and as a research tool for understanding tumors of intermediate histology. Citation Format: Lincoln David Stein, Wei Jiao, Gurnit Atwal, Quaid Morris. DeepTumour: Identify tumor origin from whole genome sequences [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5046.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→