Bridging Glycomics and Genomics: New Uses of Functional Genetics in the Study of Cellular Glycosylation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
All living cells are coated with a diverse collection of carbohydrate molecules called glycans. Glycans are key regulators of cell behavior and important therapeutic targets for human disease. Unlike proteins, glycans are not directly templated by discrete genes. Instead, they are produced through multi-gene pathways that generate a heterogenous array of glycoprotein and glycolipid antigens on the cell surface. This genetic complexity has sometimes made it challenging to understand how glycosylation is regulated and how it becomes altered in disease. Recent years, however, have seen the emergence of powerful new functional genomics technologies that allow high-throughput characterization of genetically complex cellular phenotypes. In this review, we discuss how these techniques are now being applied to achieve a deeper understanding of glyco-genomic regulation. We highlight specifically how methods like ChIP-seq, RNA-seq, CRISPR genomic screening and scRNA-seq are being used to map the genomic basis for various cell-surface glycosylation states in normal and diseased cell types. We also offer a perspective on how emerging functional genomics technologies are likely to create further opportunities for studying cellular glycobiology in the future. Taken together, we hope this review serves as a primer to recent developments at the glycomics-genomics interface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".