Daily High-Resolution Land Surface Freeze/Thaw Detection Using Sentinel-1 and AMSR2 Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-resolution surface freeze/thaw (F/T) information is valuable for hydrological, frost creep and gelifluction/solifluction, and climate prediction studies. Currently, large-scale, high-resolution F/T detection is restricted by low spatial resolution of passive microwave remote sensing sensors or low temporal resolution of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. In this study, we propose a new method for detecting daily land surface F/T state at 1 km spatial resolution by combining the Sentinel-1 radar and the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) with leaf area index (LAI) data. A non-linear relationship is established between the 1 km F/T index from Sentinel-1 with 1 km F/T index from AMSR2 (FTI) and 1 km LAI data. The 1 km FTI is a disaggregation of the 25 km FTI obtained from AMSR2. This non-linear relationship is then applied to daily 1 km FTI and LAI data to predict the 1 km daily F/T index, based on which the F/T status is detected with grid-cell-based F/T thresholds. The overall accuracy of this daily 1 km F/T is more than 88.1% when evaluated with the in situ 5 cm soil temperature over China and Canada. This study is valuable for detecting daily, high-resolution F/T status and is helpful for studies related to disaster and climate prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".