MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4282963737 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-1428

Abstract 1428: DNA methylation predicts early onset of primary tumor in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome

2022· article· en· W4282963737 on OpenAlexaffabout
Vallijah Subasri, Benjamin Brew, Lauren Erdman, Tanya Guha, Jordan R. Hansford, Elizabeth Cairney, Carol Portwine, Christine Elser, Jonathan L. Finlay, Kim E. Nichols, Wendy Kohlmann, Noa Alon, Ana Novokmet, Ledia Brunga, Anita Villani, Kelvin C. de Andrade, Payal P. Khincha, Sharon Savage, Joshua D. Schiffman, David Malkin, Anna Goldenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerDNA methylationGermlineMedicineLi–Fraumeni syndromeMethylationOncologyInternal medicineGermline mutationGeneticsBiologyMutationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome. Approximately 80% of individuals with LFS harbor a germline TP53 pathogenic variant rendering them susceptible to a wide spectrum of early-onset malignancies. A comprehensive surveillance regimen termed the ‘Toronto Protocol’, has recently been adopted for early tumor detection, demonstrating significant improvement in survival among TP53 pathogenic variant carriers. However, the protocol’s “one-size-fits-all” approach fails to consider an individual patient's risk of cancer. We built a machine learning model that predicts early-onset of primary tumors in LFS by estimating the probability of cancer onset before the age of six years, leveraging patient peripheral blood leukocyte methylation profiles. Methods: We built a gradient-boosted tree model to predict the probability of cancer onset before the age of six using methylation data from 288 TP53 pathogenic variant carriers. An external test set of 82 TP53 pathogenic variant carriers was used to validate our model. To increase the signal-to-noise ratio, methylation probes associated with TP53 status were retained and probes associated with aging were removed. In our study, we were primarily interested in minimizing the false negative rate (i.e. to reduce the number of patients who developed cancer before the age of six but were undetected by our algorithm. Findings: We correctly predicted whether the first tumor will occur before the age of six with an accuracy of 79% in our external test set. Importantly, our model classified 90% of the patients that developed cancer prior to the age of six correctly. In addition, 81% of the individuals without cancer in the external test set were predicted correctly. Interpretation: Our tool provides additional value to clinicians in stratifying patients into low- or high-risk groups of developing early-onset malignancies, and helps inform rational use of clinical surveillance tools for early cancer detection, with the ultimate aim to improve overall patient outcomes. Citation Format: Vallijah Subasri, Benjamin Brew, Lauren Erdman, Tanya Guha, Jordan R. Hansford, Elizabeth Cairney, Carol Portwine, Christine Elser, Jonathan L. Finlay, Kim E. Nichols, Wendy Kohlmann, Noa Alon, Ana Novokmet, Ledia Brunga, Anita Villani, Kelvin C. de Andrade, Payal P. Khincha, Sharon A. Savage, Joshua D. Schiffman, David Malkin, Anna Goldenberg. DNA methylation predicts early onset of primary tumor in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1428.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→