MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4282964229 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-75

Abstract 75: Highly multiplexed <i>EGFR</i> mutation detection from liquid biopsy samples using the 6-color Crystal Digital PCR™

2022· article· en· W4282964229 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cécile Jovelet, Myrtille Remy, Noémie Pata-Merci, Damien Vasseur, Ludovic Lacroix, Claudia Labrador-Rached, Allison C. Mallory

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital polymerase chain reactionLiquid biopsyEpidermal growth factor receptorLung cancerBiomarkerCancer researchMutationSomatic cellEGFR inhibitorsMedicineCancerBiologyOncologyInternal medicinePolymerase chain reactionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Liquid biopsies are a minimally invasive sampling approach to overcome the heterogeneity of tumors and represent a valuable source of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for oncological biomarker analysis. ctDNA measurements require a highly sensitive and reliable detection technology to quantify often low-level genetic aberrations within a high background of wild-type sequences. Digital PCR emerged as a powerful technology for the next-generation analysis of liquid biopsies. Stilla Technologies' 6-color naica® system is an ultrasensitive, easy-to-use digital PCR platform capable of simultaneously and precisely quantifying high numbers of biomarkers in a single reaction. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently mutated in NSCLC. A handful of anti-EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor therapies are approved by the FDA; however, most patients develop resistance over time to these treatments. Both monitoring primary EGFR mutations to predict treatment response and precociously detecting resistance mutations to adapt treatments promptly through ctDNA analysis stand to improve the effectiveness of NSCLC patient management. Stilla has developed a highly multiplexed 6-color Crystal Digital PCR EGFR kit detecting more than 90% of EGFR mutations described in NSCLC from ctDNA. The assay detects 32 common and rare somatic EGFR mutations in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21, including both activating and resistant mutations. In this work, we evaluated the sensitivity, precision and specificity of the EGFR 6-color Crystal Digital PCR assay highly specific and sensitive for the detection of EGFR mutations, with a Limit of Detection in a high background of wild-type DNA ranging from 0.30 to 0.46 cp/μL (with observed MAFs ranging from 0.06 to 0.09%). Moreover, a high concordance was observed between those EGFR results obtained for NSCLC ctDNA samples using 6-color Crystal Digital PCR and other technologies. With a rapid time to results and straightforward ctDNA analysis workflow, Crystal Digital PCR on the naica system promises ultrasensitive, highly multiplexed 6-color mutation detection, maximizing the information obtained from precious samples. Citation Format: Cécile Jovelet, Myrtille Remy, Noémie Pata-Merci, Damien Vasseur, Ludovic Lacroix, Claudia Labrador-Rached, Allison C. Mallory. Highly multiplexed EGFR mutation detection from liquid biopsy samples using the 6-color Crystal Digital PCR™ [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 75.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→