O caso SLĀV em Montreal (2018): racionalidade(s) e justiça reparadora
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste artigo abordaremos uma polêmica do Quebec em torno da apresentação em Montreal do espetáculo SLĀV, idealizado pela cantora Betty Bonifassi em uma encenação de Robert Lepage. Este teatro musical, inspirado na canção dos escravos afro-americanos, pretendia ser uma história da escravidão em todo o mundo e uma homenagem a esta arte que emergiu de condições desumanas. No entanto, grupos de pressão viram nisso mais uma manifestação do colonialismo cultural e denunciaram o fato de a produção ser inteiramente ocupada por artistas brancos. A controvérsia, que dividiu profundamente a sociedade de Quebec, durou vários meses. Inspirado nas palavras do sociólogo Gérald Bronner, para quem "defender a racionalidade é defender um mundo intelectual comum", nosso estudo visa questionar o lugar da racionalidade em uma controvérsia que envolve conteúdo emocional e relações de poder institucional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".