O caso SLĀV em Montreal (2018): racionalidade(s) e justiça reparadora
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste artigo abordaremos uma polêmica do Quebec em torno da apresentação em Montreal do espetáculo SLĀV, idealizado pela cantora Betty Bonifassi em uma encenação de Robert Lepage. Este teatro musical, inspirado na canção dos escravos afro-americanos, pretendia ser uma história da escravidão em todo o mundo e uma homenagem a esta arte que emergiu de condições desumanas. No entanto, grupos de pressão viram nisso mais uma manifestação do colonialismo cultural e denunciaram o fato de a produção ser inteiramente ocupada por artistas brancos. A controvérsia, que dividiu profundamente a sociedade de Quebec, durou vários meses. Inspirado nas palavras do sociólogo Gérald Bronner, para quem "defender a racionalidade é defender um mundo intelectual comum", nosso estudo visa questionar o lugar da racionalidade em uma controvérsia que envolve conteúdo emocional e relações de poder institucional.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".