DNA damage-induced block of sporulation in Streptomyces venezuelae involves downregulation of ssgB
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DNA damage often causes an arrest of the cell cycle that provides time for genome integrity to be restored. In bacteria, the classical SOS DNA damage response leads to an inhibition of cell division resulting in temporarily filamentous growth. This raises the question as to whether such a response mechanism might similarly function in naturally filamentous bacteria such as Streptomyces. Streptomyces exhibit two functionally distinct forms of cell division: cross-wall formation in vegetative hyphae and sporulation septation in aerial hyphae. Here, we show that the genotoxic agent mitomycin C confers a block in sporulation septation in Streptomyces venezuelae in a mechanism that involves, at least in part, the downregulation of ssgB. Notably, this DNA damage response does not appear to block cross-wall formation and may be independent of canonical SOS and developmental regulators. We also show that the mitomycin C-induced block in sporulation can be partially bypassed by the constitutive expression of ssgB, though this appears to be largely limited to mitomycin C treatment and the resultant spore-like cells have reduced viability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".