MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4282974782 · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.872565

Rotational Mechanism of FO Motor in the F-Type ATP Synthase Driven by the Proton Motive Force

2022· review· en· W4282974782 on OpenAlexaff
Shintaroh Kubo, Shoji Takada

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiology · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicATP Synthase and ATPases Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsATP synthaseChemiosmosisMechanism (biology)ProtonChemistryPhysicsBiophysicsBiologyBiochemistryEnzymeQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In F O F 1 ATP synthase, driven by the proton motive force across the membrane, the F O motor rotates the central rotor and induces conformational changes in the F 1 motor, resulting in ATP synthesis. Recently, many near-atomic resolution structural models have been obtained using cryo-electron microscopy. Despite high resolution, however, static information alone cannot elucidate how and where the protons pass through the F O and how proton passage is coupled to F O rotation. Here, we review theoretical and computational studies based on F O structure models. All-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations elucidated changes in the protonation/deprotonation of glutamate—the protein-carrier residue—during rotation and revealed the protonation states that form the “water wire” required for long-range proton hopping. Coarse-grained MD simulations unveiled a free energy surface based on the protonation state and rotational angle of the rotor. Hybrid Monte Carlo and MD simulations showed how proton transfer is coupled to rotation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MicrobiologySame topicATP Synthase and ATPases ResearchFrench-language works237,207