AuxMix: Semi-Supervised Learning with Unconstrained Unlabeled Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has seen great strides when labeled data is scarce but unlabeled data is abundant. Critically, most recent work assume that such unlabeled data is drawn from the same distribution as the labeled data. In this work, we show that state-of-the-art SSL algorithms suffer a degradation in performance in the presence of unlabeled auxiliary data that does not necessarily possess the same class distribution as the labeled set. We term this problem as Auxiliary-SSL and propose AuxMix, an algorithm that leverages self-supervised learning tasks to learn generic features in order to mask auxiliary data that are not semantically similar to the labeled set. We also propose to regularize learning by maximizing the predicted entropy for dissimilar auxiliary samples. We show an improvement of 5% over existing baselines on a ResNet-50 model when trained on CIFAR10 dataset with 4k labeled samples and all unlabeled data is drawn from the Tiny-Imagenet dataset. We report competitive results on several datasets and conduct ablation studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it