MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4282979181 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-388

Abstract 388: AI/ML-driven discovery of a novel proteoglycan for precision targeting of ADCs for disruption of stromal barriers and direct anti-tumor activity

2022· article· en· W4282979181 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth A. Koch, Max London, Amy Berkley, Allison M.L. Nixon, Sean Phippen, Kerry White, Amanda Hanson, Samuel B. Cooper, Christopher J. Harvey, Michael Briskin

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStromal cellCancer-Associated FibroblastsCancer researchCancerMedicineTriple-negative breast cancerCancer cellFibroblast activation protein, alphaBreast cancerTumor microenvironmentTumor cellsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: While checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) such as anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/L1 have demonstrated efficacy in a number of solid tumor indications, those with high stromal presence have been difficult to treat with minimal response observed. We aimed to use a proprietary machine learning/artificial intelligence platform to identify novel stromal targets to relieve this immunosuppressive barrier and increase CPI responsiveness in difficult to treat indications. Methods: Based on bioinformatic analysis using our single cell RNA atlas, we assessed cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs)/fibroblastic cells in cancer tissue for identification of novel targets, including proteoglycans. Antibodies were generated by immunization of humanized mice, and lead antibodies were tested for activity in inhibiting cell adhesion and were further characterized for staining of both CAFs as well as tumor cells. ADCs were developed and tested in vitro for selective tumor cell killing. Results: Bioinformatic analysis identified a unique subset of cancer-associated fibroblasts, termed ecmCAFs, which demonstrated selective expression of Collagen Triple Helix Repeat Containing 1 (CTHRC1). This highly-selective expression pattern suggests it may be ideal as a target for alternative modalities, including ADC targeting or specific T cell activation. In addition, we identified that in certain tumor types, such a triple negative breast cancer and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), CTHRC1 is also highly expressed by cancer cells within the tumor and shows a more favorable expression profile for ADC targeting when compared to other stromal proteins such as FAP and LRRC15. We have confirmed surface expression and binding of CTHRC1 by our lead antibodies and have observed robust internalization on both human and mouse cancer cell lines. In vitro killing of tumor cells by ADCs and in vivo PD and efficacy will be presented on both ADCs and naked antibodies. Conclusions: We have identified CTHRC1 as a novel proteoglycan expressed by both ecmCAFs and tumor cells that appears to be an ideal target for both direct inhibition of stromal barrier function as well as targeting of cytotoxic payloads as an ADC. CTHRC1 expression is more selective than the classical markers FAP and LRRC15, both of which have been previously developed as ADCs. Citation Format: Elizabeth Koch, Max London, Amy Berkley, Allison Nixon, Sean Phippen, Kerry White, Amanda Hanson, Samuel Cooper, Christopher Harvey, Michael Briskin. AI/ML-driven discovery of a novel proteoglycan for precision targeting of ADCs for disruption of stromal barriers and direct anti-tumor activity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 388.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→