Feeling the Effort of Classical Musicians - A Pipeline from Electromyography to Smartphone Vibration for Live Music Performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the MappEMG pipeline. The goal of this pipeline is to augment the traditional classical concert experience by giving listeners access, through the sense of touch, to an intimate and non-visible dimension of the musiciansâ bodily experience while performing. The live-stream pipeline produces vibrations based on muscle activity captured through surface electromyography (EMG). Therefore, MappEMG allows the audience to experience the performerâs muscle effort, an essential component of music performance which is typically unavailable to direct visual observation. The paper is divided in four sections. First, we overview related works on EMG, music performance, and vibrotactile feedback. We then present conceptual and methodological issues of capturing musiciansâ muscle effort related to their expressive intentions. We further explain the different components of the live-stream data pipeline: a python software named Biosiglive for data acquisition and processing, a Max/MSP patch for data post-processing and mapping, and a mobile application named hAPPtiks for real-time control of smartphonesâ vibration. Finally, we address the application of the pipeline in an actual music performance. Thanks to their modular structure, the tools presented could be used in different creative and biomedical contexts involving gestural control of haptic stimuli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".