Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The overarching purpose of this research was to examine the experiences of 1 family living with a child with Helsmoortel-Van Der Aa syndrome or activity-dependent neuroprotective protein (ADNP) syndrome. DESIGN: A retrospective qualitative design was used for this study. METHODS: Two primary caregivers for a 5-year-old child with ADNP syndrome completed background questionnaires to provide context for semistructured interviews. Each caregiver completed 2 interviews, approximately 2 months apart. Field notes, member checks, and triangulation were used to enhance the credibility of the study. RESULTS: This article summarizes the theme "All in the Family." Having a child with ADNP syndrome affected all aspects of family life. Participants revealed that family dynamics were shaped by experiences stemming from their living arrangements and caregiving responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this research highlighted the need for increased support for families faced with ADNP syndrome, as well as the role clinical nurse specialists can play in the lives of caregivers faced with such a rare diagnosis. Furthermore, given the paucity of ADNP syndrome information, the need for more research is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".