MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283019028 · doi:10.53876/001c.33954

An unusual presentation of an aggressive form of breast cancer: A case study

2022· article· en· W4283019028 on OpenAlexaff
Laurie Freeman‐Gibb, Julie Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Cancer Care and Delivery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMalignancyBreast cancerPresentation (obstetrics)Metastatic breast cancerCancerSurgeryLesionChemotherapyDiseaseMetastasisRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the case reported, a breast cancer diagnosis unfolded over several weeks during follow-up of a non-healing, non-metastatic foot phalangeal fracture. Non-healing bone fractures can be related to systemic disease including undiagnosed breast cancer. Although not found to be a metastatic lesion, once chemotherapy began the phalangeal fracture wholly healed. There were no cases or studies found in the literature describing the root cause and then restoration of non-healing, non-metastatic fractures once a breast malignancy was diagnosed and treatment initiated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Cancer Care and DeliverySame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207