MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283022335 · doi:10.4000/aes.4594

Les lettres d’Italie de Rabelais éditées par messieurs de Sainte-Marthe ou l’invention d’un recueil épistolaire

2022· article· fr· W4283022335 on OpenAlexaff
Claude La Charité

Bibliographic record

VenueArts et Savoirs · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1651, paraissent pour la première fois les lettres envoyées de Rome par Rabelais à Geoffroy d’Estissac entre décembre 1535 et février 1536. Cette étude met en évidence comment les éditeurs de ces lettres, messieurs de Sainte-Marthe, inventent le corpus épistolaire des lettres d’Italie de Rabelais, dans le double sens du mot, c’est-à-dire comment ils exhument des textes inédits et comment, par ailleurs, ils construisent un objet textuel qui, dans une large mesure, est une fabrication éditoriale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArts et SavoirsSame topicRenaissance Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207