MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283026092 · doi:10.21037/tcr-21-2324

Mechanical property evaluation of the right ventricular myocardium in cancer patients with chemotherapy by echocardiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4283026092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shi Xueli, Yi‐Ping Wang, Jianzhong Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Cancer Research · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricleInternal medicineCardiologyCardiotoxicityChemotherapyPulmonary arteryMeta-analysisRadiation therapyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity has recently become an area of intense research. As the prognostic role of the right ventricle (RV) in a variety of cardiovascular diseases has been confirmed, and several studies have paid increased attention to RV function in cancer patients who have underwent chemotherapy, we provide a meta-analysis to objectively evaluate the mechanical properties of the right ventricular myocardium by echocardiography in this population. Methods: We systematically searched Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases were applied to search for studies (published before August 11, 2021) comparing RV contraction measured by echocardiography at baseline to follow-up in cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The mechanical properties of the right ventricular myocardium were pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), systolic velocity of tricuspid annulus (S'), right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS), right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), and right ventricular fractional area change (RVFAC). We analyzed pooled data using a random-effects model and assessed risk of bias in the included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Twenty-one trials were enrolled (N=1,355 participants). Cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy but not radiotherapy showed an increase in PASP [standardized mean difference (SMD) =0.161, 95% CI: 0.007 to 0.316) compared with the condition at baseline, as well as reductions in TAPSE (SMD =-0.543, 95% CI: -0.698 to -0.389), S' (SMD =-0.507, 95% CI: -0.748 to -0.266), RVFWLS (SMD =0.833, 95% CI: 0.549 to 1.118) and RVGLS (SMD =1.017, 95% CI: 0.751 to 1.283). There was no significant difference in RVFAC (SMD =-0.097, 95% CI: -0.213 to 0.018). Furthermore, these indicators pointed to a deterioration of right ventricular contraction function in cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The risk of bias of the included studies evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was medium to high. Discussion: Right ventricular contraction function would deteriorate in cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, especially with the prolongation of chemotherapy duration and accumulation of chemotherapeutic drugs. Further studies are needed to establish the definition of right ventricular systolic dysfunction in clinical practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational Cancer ResearchSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207