MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283030084 · doi:10.4000/rdctss.3365

Le salarié lanceur d’alerte au Québec

2022· article· fr· W4283030084 on OpenAlexaffabout
Urwana Coiquaud, Jeanne Pérès

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceSilenceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quel arbitrage font les tribunaux québécois entre la liberté d’expression et le devoir de loyauté des salariés « lanceurs d’alerte »? Quelles sont les protections juridiques auxquelles les salariés du secteur privé et du secteur public peuvent prétendre lorsqu’ils décident de briser le silence ? Et que nous enseigne la jurisprudence quant à l’effectivité de ces protections? Ce sont les trois questions auxquelles cet article entend répondre en se centrant sur le droit québécois.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité socialeSame topicCorporate Law and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207