MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283030324 · doi:10.1101/2022.06.15.22276090

Two-Step Machine Learning to Diagnose and Predict Involvement of Lungs in COVID-19 and Pneumonia using CT Radiomics

2022· preprint· en· W4283030324 on OpenAlexaff
Pegah Moradi Khaniabadi, Yassine Bouchareb, Humoud Al Dhuhli, Isaac Shiri, Faiza Al Kindi, Bita Moradi Khaniabadi, Habib Zaidi, Arman Rahmim

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom forestArtificial intelligenceFeature selectionComputer scienceMachine learningSupport vector machineCorrelationMajority ruleRadiomicsOversamplingPattern recognition (psychology)HistogramPneumoniaDecision treeFeature (linguistics)MedicineMathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective We aimed to develop a two-step machine learning (ML) based model to diagnose and predict involvement of lungs in COVID-19 and non COVID-19 pneumonia patients using CT chest radiomic features. Methods Three hundred CT scans (3-classes: 100 COVID-19, 100 pneumonia, and 100 healthy subjects) were enrolled in this study. Diagnostic task included 3-class classification. For severity prediction, two radiologists scored involvement of lungs in COVID-19 and pneumonia scans based on percentage of involvement in all 5 lobes. Datasets were classified into mild (0-25%), moderate (26-50%), and severe (>50%). Whole lungs were segmented utilizing deep learning-based segmentation method. Altogether, 107 features including shape, first-order histogram, second and high order texture features were extracted. For both tasks, datasets were randomly divided into 90% training sets (70% and 30% for training and validation, respectively) and 10% test sets. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC≥90%) was performed to exclude highly correlated features. Subsequently, different feature selection algorithms (Correlation attribute evaluation, Information gain attribute, Wrapper Subset selection algorithm, Relief method, and Correlation-based feature selection) were assessed. The most pertinent features were finally selected using voting method based on the evaluation of all algorithms. Several ML-based supervised algorithms were utilized, namely Naïve Bays, Support Vector Machine, Bagging, Random Forest, K-nearest neighbors, Decision Tree and Ensemble Meta voting. The synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was used to balance the three classes in training sets. The optimal model was first selected based on precision, recall and area-under-curve (AUC) by randomizing the training/validation sets 20 times, followed by testing using the test set. To ensure the repeatability of the results, the entire process was repeated 50 times. Results Nine pertinent features (2 shape, 1 first-order, and 6 second-order features) were obtained after feature selection for both phases. In diagnostic task, the performance of 3-class classification using Random Forest was 0.909±0.026, 0.907±0.056, 0.902±0.044, 0.939±0.031, and 0.982±0.010 for precision, recall, F1-score, accuracy, and AUC, respectively. The severity prediction task using Random Forest achieved 0.868±0.123 precision, 0.865±0.121 recall, 0.853±0.139 F1-score, 0.934±0.024 accuracy, and 0.969±0.022 AUC. Conclusion The two-phase ML-based model accurately classified COVID-19 and pneumonia patients using CT radiomics, and adequately predicted severity of lungs involvement. This 2-steps model showed great potential in assessing COVID-19 CT images towards improved management of patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207