NTRK-Rearranged Uterine Sarcomas: Clinicopathologic Features of 15 Cases, Literature Review, and Risk Stratification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
NTRK -rearranged uterine sarcomas are rare spindle cell neoplasms that typically arise in the uterine cervix of young women. Some tumors recur or metastasize, but features which predict behavior have not been identified to date. Distinguishing these tumors from morphologic mimics is significant because patients with advanced stage disease may be treated with TRK inhibitors. Herein, we present 15 cases of NTRK- rearranged uterine sarcomas, the largest series to date. Median patient age was 35 years (range: 16 to 61). The majority arose in the uterine cervix (n=14) and all but 2 were organ-confined at diagnosis. Tumors were composed of an infiltrative, fascicular proliferation of spindle cells and most showed mild-to-moderate cytologic atypia. All were pan-TRK positive by immunohistochemistry (13/13); S100 (11/13) and CD34 (6/10) were usually positive. RNA or DNA sequencing found NTRK1 (10/13) and NTRK3 (3/13) fusions with partners TPR , TPM3 , EML4 , TFG , SPECC1L , C16orf72 , and IRF2BP2 . Unusual morphology was seen in 2 tumors which were originally diagnosed as unclassifiable uterine sarcomas, 1 of which also harbored TP53 mutations. Follow up was available for 9 patients, of whom 3 died of disease. By incorporating outcome data of previously reported tumors, adverse prognostic features were identified, including a mitotic index ≥8 per 10 high-power fields, lymphovascular invasion, necrosis, and NTRK3 fusion. Patients with tumors which lacked any of these 4 features had an excellent prognosis. This study expands the morphologic spectrum of NTRK -rearranged uterine sarcomas and identifies features which can be used for risk stratification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".