Soil-Structure Interaction and Retaining walls: A Review Paper
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This general report is prepared from the selected 32 papers of 19th ICSMGE 2017 which are in the area of soil structure interaction and retaining walls relevant to the ISSMGE Technical Committee TC 207. Research papers presented during the session of TC 207 – Soil-Structure Interaction and Retaining walls are from 22 member societies of ISSMGE, which cover Argentina (1), Brazil(1), Canada (1), China (1), Egypt (2), Hong Kong (1), Hungary (1), India (2), Iran (1), Japan (2), Kazakhstan (2), Korea (2), Mexico(1), Netherland (1), New Zealand (1), Romania (1), Russia (2), South East Asia (1), Syria (1), Tunisia (1), UK (4) and USA (2). Valuein parenthesis signifies number of papers from that particular member society. The research areas of these articles cover a various sub-themes namely (1) Laboratory Testing and Modeling (2) Small and Large Works (3) Natural Hazards (4) Environmental Preservation and Sustainable Development (5) Geotechnical Cultures and Responsibilities (6) Future Technological Innovation. Keywords: retaining wall, deep excavation, finite element method, in-situ measurements, numerical and analytical methods
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".