MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283075535 · doi:10.35940/ijitee.g9996.0711822

Review Paper on E-Traffic Police IoT Based Auto-Detection of Traffic Rule Violation

2022· article· en· W4283075535 on OpenAlexaff
Mrs. Priya N, G Sai Mani Kumar, Bijender Kumar, M. Vinay Kumar Reddy, B Sree Harsha

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer securityJumpInternet of ThingsFocus (optics)SIGNAL (programming language)Government (linguistics)Transport engineeringComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is known fact that accidents are the major problem that is occurring now a days. Wearing helmets is one of the mandatory rule made by the government. Even after implementing these rules some of the bike riders are avoiding it. Because of this reason, we are seeing the increase of accidents. Also, due to slow reach of treatment accidents occurring at small areas are becoming fatal. current project looks to solve these problems. In this project a message will be sent to the rider that to wear the helmet, triple riding, signal jump, overspeed and also sends a message if driver isn’t in active mode. These accidents leads to significant amount of death and disability. In India, Avoiding traffic rules like triple riding, signal jump, overspeed are causing major accidents. All the systems focus on changes occur in movement of vechicles, and sends a message if the rider avoids any of the mentioned traffic rules, which have been already explained in the literature survey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring EngineeringSame topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207