MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283079520 · doi:10.1089/forensic.2022.0005

Addressing the Need to Educate Service Providers on Trans-Affirming Postsexual Assault Care: An E-Learning Curriculum

2022· article· en· W4283079520 on OpenAlexaffabout
Janice Du Mont, Sarah Daisy Kosa, Hyuna Seo, Sheila Macdonald

Bibliographic record

VenueForensic Genomics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario HIV Treatment NetworkPublic Health OntarioWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumTransgenderService providerSexual assaultNursingSexual abuseMedical educationService (business)Sexual violenceHealth careMedicinePsychologySuicide preventionPoison controlPedagogyPolitical scienceMedical emergencyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transgender (trans) survivors of sexual assault are often seen by health care providers who lack the necessary training to provide inclusive care and supports. To foster trans-affirming care provision postsexual assault, in 2019–2020, we developed and successfully evaluated an e-learning curriculum for forensic nurses working across Ontario, Canada. The curriculum, entitled Providing Trans-Affirming Care for Sexual Assault Survivors, was later broadened for use by various types of service providers and made freely accessible. Since this time, there has been good uptake of the curriculum across a diverse range of professionals and organizations. Our curriculum is one important and novel initiative to advance the provision of trans-affirming care and supports for trans survivors of sexual assault. The curriculum can be adapted, as necessary, to local contexts and used in other jurisdictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForensic GenomicsSame topicSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesFrench-language works237,207