MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283120850 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u2znb

Ownership intuitions are similar in Canadian and Papuan children

2022· preprint· en· W4283120850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michał Białek, Michał Stefańczyk, Piotr Sorokowski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Animal Learning Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPossession (linguistics)Object (grammar)IndigenousPsychologyContrast (vision)InferencePermissionSocial psychologyPolitical scienceLawEpistemologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophyEcologyBiologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intuitions about ownership, originally established in Canadian preschooler, were tested in children of indigenous Papuan society (N = 79, Mage = 7, 49.4% female). Successful replications of the findings showed that people infer ownership from (1) control of permission, (2) ownership of the territory the object is located in, and (3) manmade vs natural origins of the object, and (4) that people assign ownership to person who achieved a goal, in contrast to a person who originally pursued a goal but failed to be the first to claim it. One replication was statistically non-significant, but suggested the same direction of inference about ownership from first observed possession of an object. Our conclusion support the claimed universal character of ownership intuitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207