MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283155739 · doi:10.1002/aic.17812

Model predictive control of a second‐order hyperbolic transport‐reaction process

2022· article· en· W4283155739 on OpenAlexaff
Guilherme Ozorio Cassol, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)DiscretizationHyperbolic partial differential equationMathematicsObserver (physics)Partial differential equationApplied mathematicsBoundary (topology)Riccati equationMathematical analysisControl (management)Computer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The model predictive controller (MPC) design is developed for a tubular chemical reactor, considering a second‐order hyperbolic partial differential equation as the model of the transport‐reaction process with boundary actuation. Without loss of generality, closed–closed boundary conditions and relaxed total flux are assumed. At the same time, the model is discretized in time by the Cayley–Tustin method, and, under the assumption that only the reactor's output is measurable, the observer design for the state reconstruction is addressed and integrated with the MPC design. The Luenberger observer gain is obtained by solving the operator Ricatti equation in the discrete‐time setting, while the MPC accounts for constrained and optimal control. The simulations show that the output‐based MPC design stabilizes the system under the input and output constraints satisfaction. In addition, to address the models' disparities, the results for both parabolic and hyperbolic equations are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIChE JournalSame topicStability and Controllability of Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207