MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4283157182 · doi:10.1101/2022.06.14.496193

Adaptation to climate change through dense planting for sustainable agriculture

2022· preprint· en· W4283157182 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Zhixiong Huang, Xue He, Xueqiang Zhao, Wan Teng, Mengyun Hu, Hui Li, Yijing Zhang, Yi‐Ping Tong

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsAgricultureClimate changeTranscription factorSowingArabidopsisSustainable agricultureBiologyGrain yieldAdaptation (eye)Cell biologyAgronomyGeneMutantEcologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Overuse of fertilizers increased greenhouse gases emissions, induced global climate changes and extreme weather and made future agriculture unsustainable. Engineering crops to adapt to stressed conditions is crucial. Here, we cloned a transcription factor TabZIP45 (basic region zipper), controlled by a microRNA binding site polymorphism, conferring adaptation to both nitrogen deficiency and dense planting. TabZIP45 interacted with TaFTL43 (Flowering locus T like43) to change gene expression regulation. TabZIP45 coordinated phosphatidylinositol diphosphate (PIP2) metabolism and calcium (Ca 2+ ) signaling to adapt to environmental stresses. Knockout of TabZIP45-4B by genome editing rescued grain yield loss caused by nitrogen deficiency by modulation of TaDwarf4 under dense planting through Ca 2+ signaling disruption. Thus, TabZIP45-4B edited wheat warranted a sustainable and environmentally friendly way to enhance grain yield under adverse conditions. One-Sentence Summary Calcium and lipids integrated adverse environmental signaling to modulate plant growth

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism→French-language works237,207→