An Investigation into the Charge Storage Mechanism and Cycling Performance of Mn<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> as the Cathode Material for Zinc‐Ion Batteries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this work, highly crystalline, nanosize Mn 2 O 3 powder is synthesized via a precipitation and calcination method for utilization as the cathode in aqueous zinc‐ion batteries (aZIBs). The resultant electrodes are characterized using electrochemical and microstructural methods to determine the mechanisms associated with charge and discharge. In addition, a few quantitative testing methods are used to investigate cycling performance stability. A specific capacity of 211 mAh g −1 is retained after 200 cycles at a current density of 500 mA g −1 with 93 % capacity retention. Also, 73 % capacity retention can be reached after 1100 cycles at 2000 mA g −1 . The energy storage mechanism associated with Mn 2 O 3 is for the first time proposed to be a chemical conversion reaction type with two steps involving the formation/decomposition of ZnMn 2 O 4 (hetaerolite) and zinc sulphate hydroxide (ZHS). Also, capacity fading is directly linked to the incomplete reversibility of the chemical conversion reaction mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it