MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283160106 · doi:10.1016/j.wace.2022.100474

Convective environments leading to microburst, macroburst and downburst events across the United States

2022· article· en· W4283160106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueWeather and Climate Extremes · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNarodowe Centrum Nauki
KeywordsMicroburstThunderstormStormConvective storm detectionEnvironmental scienceClimatologyMeteorologyLightning (connector)RadiosondeAtmospheric sciencesTornadoLapse rateConvective available potential energySevere weatherConvectionGeologyGeographyWind shearWind speed

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Downbursts are strong downdrafts of negatively buoyant air associated with convective storms and are capable of producing severe near-surface winds. Microbursts and macrobursts are subcategories of downbursts with the horizontal extent of damaging winds smaller or larger than 4 km, respectively. From January 2000 to June 2020, the Severe Weather Event Reports provided by the National Centers for Environmental Information (hereafter: Storm Events Database) contained 927 downburst, 914 microburst, and only 27 macroburst entries. We found a spatial variability of reported downbursts that is unlikely to be a result of natural processes, but rather artificially caused by the population density. An example of this bias is the abrupt decline in the number of reported events between southern and northern Arizona. Combining the Storm Events Database, ERA5 reanalysis and lightning data from the National Lightning Detection Network, we showed that cold pool strength, low-level lapse rates, WINDEX, lifted condensation level, DCAPE, WMAXSHEAR, derecho composite parameter, 2-m temperature, delta theta-e and mean low-level relative humidity demonstrate some value in downburst prediction. By combining the best predictor (cold pool strength) with the least correlated WMAXSHEAR, we created a downburst environment index (DEI) and used it to model climatological frequency of favorable downburst environments. Our analysis has shown that favorable downburst environments conditioned on lightning are the most frequent during summer over Southwest and Southeast with the most extreme environments across Great Plains. The vertical profiles of theta-e for the downburst events from reanalysis are further compared against nonsevere thunderstorms and rawinsonde data from four downburst field measurement campaigns. The results show that changes in theta-e over the lowest 200 hPa are the most important for downburst formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it