Women and Witnesses Twice Silenced: Giving a Voice to Holocaust Complicity and Resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Women’s voices had no place in the Third Reich, and the Christian churches agreed: a woman’s place was in the kitchen. After the war, women’s voices frankly discussed the churches’ shame. Some Christians had colluded, others stood silently by, and some of those who resisted the persecution of Jewish converts did not fully understand the injustice and cruelty of socially normalised anti-Semitism. Theologically trained female vicars who had never been permitted to serve the church, stepped into pastoral duties when men were imprisoned, executed, or sent to the front. They took risks to bring spiritual hope to villagers who were fearful, confused, and appalled, by war. Victoria Barnett worked as a journalist in Germany in the 1970s and collected the accounts of Confessing Church members who resisted Hitler, to help expose the moral failures of the holocaust for the evangelical church. When Barnett returned to the US, she began her life’s work in the reconciliation of Christians and Jews. Her books analyse the silence and complicity of ordinary people during the holocaust. They are not easy reading, but her work is important in an age where people still face discrimination, repression and persecution, and institutional silence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".