MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283169822 · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2022.862551

Review: High-Entropy Materials for Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes

2022· article· en· W4283169822 on OpenAlexafffund
James Sturman, Elena A. Baranova, Yaser Abu‐Lebdeh

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Energy Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersOffice of Energy Research and DevelopmentNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsAnodeBattery (electricity)Materials scienceElectrolyteElectrodeCathodeNanotechnologyLithium-ion batteryElectrochemistryEnergy densityEnergy storageElectronicsEngineering physicsElectrical engineeringPower (physics)EngineeringChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lithium-ion battery is a type of rechargeable power source with applications in portable electronics and electric vehicles. There is a thrust in the industry to increase the capacity of electrode materials and hence the energy density of the battery. The high-entropy (HE) concept is one strategy that may allow for the compositional variability needed to design new materials for next-generation batteries. Inspired by HE-alloys, HE-oxides are an emerging class of multicomponent ceramics with promising electrochemical properties. This review will focus on the application of these materials to the development of new battery electrodes with insight into the materials’ structure/property relationship and battery performance. We highlight recent results on HE-oxides for the cathode and anode. In addition, we discuss some emerging results on HE-solid electrolytes and HE-alloy anodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Energy ResearchSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207