A protoxylem pathway to evolution of pith? An hypothesis based on the Early Devonian euphyllophyte <i>Leptocentroxyla</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Early Devonian (Emsian, 400-395 Ma) tracheophyte Leptocentroxyla tetrarcha Bickner et Tomescu emend. Tomescu et McQueen combines plesiomorphic Psilophyton-type tracheid thickenings with xylem architecture intermediate between the plesiomorphic basal euphyllophyte haplosteles and the complex actinosteles of Middle Devonian euphyllophytes. We document xylem development in Leptocentroxyla based on anatomy and explore its implications, which may provide a window into the evolution of pith. METHODS: Leptocentroxyla is preserved by permineralization in the Battery Point Formation (Quebec, Canada). Serial sections obtained using the cellulose acetate peel technique document branching pattern, anatomy of trace divergence to appendages, protoxylem architecture, and variations in tracheid size and wall thickening patterns. KEY RESULTS: Leptocentroxyla has opposite decussate pseudo-whorled branching and mesarch protoxylem, and represents the earliest instance of central histological differentiation in a euphyllophyte actinostele. Tracheids at the centre of xylem exhibit simplified Psilophyton-type wall thickenings and are similar in size (at the axis centre) or smaller than the surrounding metaxylem tracheids (at the centre of appendage traces). CONCLUSIONS: The position and developmental attributes of the simplified Psilophyton-type tracheids suggest they may have been generated by the protoxylem developmental pathway. This supports the delayed and shortened protoxylem differentiation hypothesis, which explains the evolution of pith by (1) delay in the onset of differentiation and lengthening of cell growth duration in a central protoxylem strand; and (2) shortening of the interval of differentiation of those tracheids, leading to progressive simplification (and eventual loss) of secondary wall thickenings, and replacement of tracheids with a central parenchymatous area. NAC domain transcription factors and their interactions with abscisic acid may have provided the regulatory substrate for the developmental changes that led to the evolution of pith. These could have been orchestrated by selective pressures associated with the expansion of early vascular plants into water-stresses upland environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".