Artificial Neural Network Approach to Competency-Based Training Using a Virtual Reality Neurosurgical Simulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The methodology of assessment and training of surgical skills is evolving to deal with the emergence of competency-based training. Artificial neural networks (ANNs), a branch of artificial intelligence, can use newly generated metrics not only for assessment performance but also to quantitate individual metric importance and provide new insights into surgical expertise. OBJECTIVE: To outline the educational utility of using an ANN in the assessment and quantitation of surgical expertise. A virtual reality vertebral osteophyte removal during a simulated surgical spine procedure is used as a model to outline this methodology. METHODS: Twenty-one participants performed a simulated anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion on the Sim-Ortho virtual reality simulator. Participants were divided into 3 groups, including 9 postresidents, 5 senior residents, and 7 junior residents. Data were retrieved from the osteophyte removal component of the scenario, which involved using a simulated burr. The data were manipulated to initially generate 83 performance metrics spanning 3 categories (safety, efficiency, and motion) of which only the most relevant metrics were used to train and test the ANN. RESULTS: The ANN model was trained on 6 safety metrics to a testing accuracy of 83.3%. The contributions of these performance metrics to expertise were revealed through connection weight products and outlined 2 identifiable learning patterns of technical skills. CONCLUSION: This study outlines the potential utility of ANNs which allows a deeper understanding of the composites of surgical expertise and may contribute to the paradigm shift toward competency-based surgical training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".