MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283214691 · doi:10.1039/d2cc02362h

Substitution at boron in BODIPYs

2022· review· en· W4283214691 on OpenAlexafffund
Rosinah Liandrah Gapare, Alison Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBoronSubstitution (logic)ChemistryAtom (system on chip)Combinatorial chemistryLigand (biochemistry)PhotochemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

-indacenes (BODIPYs) with varying substituents at the meso, pyrrolic and/or boron sites, with each influencing photophysical properties and utility. This Feature article gives an overview of chemistry at the boron atom in BODIPYs, highlighting our contributions that evolved from synthetic curiosities and now offer this dipyrrolic skeleton potential across a wider range of applications. We first summarise preparative routes to BODIPYs through complexation of boron with the dipyrrinato ligand. The role of boron in protecting dipyrrins is then discussed, followed by strategies by which to achieve facile substitution at the boron atom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical CommunicationsSame topicLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsFrench-language works237,207