MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283215079 · doi:10.1101/2022.06.18.496666

Red blood cell dynamics in extravascular biological tissues modelled as canonical disordered porous media

2022· preprint· en· W4283215079 on OpenAlexaff
Qi Zhou, Kerstin Schirrmann, Eleanor Doman, Qi Chen, Naval Singh, P. Ravi Selvaganapathy, Miguel O. Bernabéu, Oliver E. Jensen, Anne Juel, Igor L. Chernyavsky, Timm Krüger

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilChina Scholarship CouncilFondation LeducqUniversity of EdinburghUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsIntervillous spacePorous mediumBlood flowHemodynamicsBiophysicsHomogeneousCapillary actionChemistryBiologyPlacentaMaterials sciencePorosityFetusMedicinePhysicsInternal medicineThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207