MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283216500 · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.928837

Establishing a Common Nutritional Vocabulary - From Food Production to Diet

2022· article· en· W4283216500 on OpenAlexaff
Liliana Andrés‐Hernández, Kai Blumberg, Ramona Walls, Damion Dooley, Ramil Mauleon, Matthew Lange, Magalie Weber, Lauren Chan, Adnan Malik, Anders Bjørn Møller, Jayne Ireland, Lucía Segovia de la Revilla, Xuhuiqun Zhang, Britt Burton‐Freeman, Paul Magelli, Andrew Schriever, Shavawn M. Forester, Lei Liu, Graham J.W. King

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Nutrition · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilSouthern Cross UniversityU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsStandardizationProduction (economics)VocabularyFood securityFood processingOntologyConsumption (sociology)Computer scienceBusinessFood scienceAgricultureBiologyEcologySociologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Informed policy and decision-making for food systems, nutritional security, and global health would benefit from standardization and comparison of food composition data, spanning production to consumption. To address this challenge, we present a formal controlled vocabulary of terms, definitions, and relationships within the Compositional Dietary Nutrition Ontology (CDNO, www.cdno.info) that enables description of nutritional attributes for material entities contributing to the human diet. We demonstrate how ongoing community development of CDNO classes can harmonize trans-disciplinary approaches for describing nutritional components from food production to diet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NutritionSame topicBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207