MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detailed Bond Graph Modeling of PV-Battery System

2022· article· en· W4283216505 on OpenAlexaffabout
S. Arash Omidi, Geoff Rideout, M. Tariq Iqbal

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBond graphPhotovoltaic systemDuty cycleGraphComputer scienceInverterGridElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageEngineeringMathematicsTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bond graph modelling of a Photovoltaic system is presented in this study. A Photovoltaic system's four main components are Photovoltaic generator, DC-DC converter, battery, and DC-AC inverter. This study shows the bond graph models of the aforementioned part. A five-parameters PV generator is chosen based on high accuracy and illustrating of the effects of temperature and solar irradiation. To develop a link with reality, the bond graph model is created using the specs of the CS1U-400 Canadian solar module. The effects of different duty cycles have been examined using a bond graph model of a synchronous Boost converter and a synchronous Cuk converter. For a Lead Acid Battery, a novel bond graph model was developed. This model investigates the impacts of temperature and current in charging and discharging scenarios. Finally, a 3-phase inverter bond graph is designed to connect the PV system to the grid. The 20-Sim software is used to simulate the developed models, and the results are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS)Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207