MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Predictive Maintenance and Condition Monitoring in Machine Tools: An IoT Approach

2022· article· en· W4283218269 on OpenAlex
Brett Sicard, Naseem Alsadi, Petros Spachos, Youssef Ziada, S. Andrew Gadsden

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntimePredictive maintenanceInternet of ThingsComputer scienceCondition monitoringQuality (philosophy)Reliability engineeringPreventive maintenanceSelection (genetic algorithm)Embedded systemEngineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To maximize efficiency, quality of products, and profits, it is important to maintain machine tools to reduce downtime and maximize output. Predictive maintenance is the most efficient method of condition monitoring and maintenance. An Internet of Things approach can help implement an autonomous predictive CM system in manufacturing facilities. The critical parameters of sensor selection, communication, and data analysis have been examined. The components that make up an effective IoT CM system have been discussed and analyzed. An IoT approach has been shown to eliminate the disadvantages of traditional manual CM approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it