MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283219752 · doi:10.1101/2022.06.20.496847

Biosensor optimization using a FRET pair based on mScarlet red fluorescent protein and an mScarlet-derived green fluorescent protein

2022· preprint· en· W4283219752 on OpenAlexafffund
Khyati Gohil, Sheng-Yi Wu, Kei Takahashi-Yamashiro, Yi Shen, Robert E. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of AlbertaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsFörster resonance energy transferBiosensorFluorescenceGreen fluorescent proteinFluorescent proteinAutofluorescenceChemistryBiophysicsCyanProtein engineeringAequorea victoriaBiochemistryBiologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Genetically encoded biosensors based on Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) are indispensable tools for monitoring biochemical changes in cells. Green and red fluorescent protein-based FRET pairs offer advantages over the classically employed cyan and yellow fluorescent protein pairs, such as better spectral separation, lower phototoxicity, and less autofluorescence. Here, we describe the development of an mScarlet-derived green fluorescent protein (designated as mWatermelon) and its use as a FRET donor to the red fluorescent protein mScarlet-I as a FRET acceptor. We tested the functionality of this FRET pair by engineering biosensors for the detection of protease activity, Ca 2+ , and K + . Furthermore, we described a strategy to enhance the FRET efficiency of these biosensors by modulating the intramolecular association between mWatermelon and mScarlet-I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207