Optimal Timing for Bandwidth Reservation for Time-Sensitive Vehicular Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bandwidth is a valuable and scarce resource in mobile networks. Therefore, bandwidth reservation may become necessary to support time-sensitive and safety-critical networked vehicular applications such as autonomous driving. Such applications require individual and deterministic approaches for reservations. This is challenging as vehicles usually have insufficient information to reason about future driving paths as well as future network resources availability and costs. In particular, the optimal time for a vehicle to place a cost-efficient reservation request is crucial. If a reservation is conducted too early, the uncertainty in path prediction may become high resulting in frequent cancellations with high costs. If a reservation is requested too late, resources may no longer be available. In this paper, we study the optimal timing for a given vehicle to place a bandwidth reservation request for an upcoming trip. Our proposal is based on predicting bandwidth costs using well-selected temporal machine learning techniques while achieving high accuracy levels. The proposed reservation scheme relies on a corpus of real-world traffic data. The experimental results prove that the model can effectively learn to find an optimized timing for bandwidth reservation. In addition, our model may allow vehicles to save considerably costs compared to the baseline of an immediate reservation scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".