Synthesis and Characterization of Novel NiW–CeO2 Composite Coating with Enhanced Corrosion and Wear Resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compact and uniform NiW composite coatings filled with ceramic particles such as CeO2 were electrodeposited on brass substrates using direct current (DC) and a well–designed pulse reverse current waveforms (PRC). PRC coatings exhibited the noblest corrosion potential and lowest current density compared to DC–electrodeposited coatings. Among all PRC coatings, PRC–NiW–CeO2 demonstrated the highest corrosion potential (−4.72 × 10−1 V) and the lowest current density (5.32 × 10−6 V). It also seems that the addition of CeO2 particles to the NiW matrix enhanced the wear resistance of the coatings, and the lowest wear volume of (133.10 × 103 µm3) and friction coefficient of 0.25 were obtained due to the formation of the uniform, void free and compact structures with a high content of CeO2 particles in the coating.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".