MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283266396 · doi:10.3390/ijms23136889

In Silico Molecular Dynamics of Griseofulvin and Its Derivatives Revealed Potential Therapeutic Applications for COVID-19

2022· article· en· W4283266396 on OpenAlexafffund
Parisa Aris, Masoud Mohamadzadeh, Yulong Wei, Xuhua Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute Canada
KeywordsGriseofulvinProteaseChemistryDocking (animal)PharmacologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Drug repositioningHydrogen bondEnzymeDrugStereochemistryBiochemistryBiologyMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseaseOrganic chemistryInternal medicineVeterinary medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Treatment options for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain limited, and the option of repurposing approved drugs with promising medicinal properties is of increasing interest in therapeutic approaches to COVID-19. Using computational approaches, we examined griseofulvin and its derivatives against four key anti-SARS-CoV-2 targets: main protease, RdRp, spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD), and human host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Molecular docking analysis revealed that griseofulvin (CID 441140) has the highest docking score (-6.8 kcal/mol) with main protease of SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, griseofulvin derivative M9 (CID 144564153) proved the most potent inhibitor with -9.49 kcal/mol, followed by A3 (CID 46844082) with -8.44 kcal/mol against M protease and ACE2, respectively. Additionally, H bond analysis revealed that compound A3 formed the highest number of hydrogen bonds, indicating the strongest inhibitory efficacy against ACE2. Further, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation analysis revealed that griseofulvin and these derivatives are structurally stable. These findings suggest that griseofulvin and its derivatives may be considered when designing future therapeutic options for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207