In Silico Molecular Dynamics of Griseofulvin and Its Derivatives Revealed Potential Therapeutic Applications for COVID-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment options for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain limited, and the option of repurposing approved drugs with promising medicinal properties is of increasing interest in therapeutic approaches to COVID-19. Using computational approaches, we examined griseofulvin and its derivatives against four key anti-SARS-CoV-2 targets: main protease, RdRp, spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD), and human host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Molecular docking analysis revealed that griseofulvin (CID 441140) has the highest docking score (-6.8 kcal/mol) with main protease of SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, griseofulvin derivative M9 (CID 144564153) proved the most potent inhibitor with -9.49 kcal/mol, followed by A3 (CID 46844082) with -8.44 kcal/mol against M protease and ACE2, respectively. Additionally, H bond analysis revealed that compound A3 formed the highest number of hydrogen bonds, indicating the strongest inhibitory efficacy against ACE2. Further, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation analysis revealed that griseofulvin and these derivatives are structurally stable. These findings suggest that griseofulvin and its derivatives may be considered when designing future therapeutic options for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".