Optimal Gear-Shifting of a Wet-Type Two-Speed Dual-Brake Transmission for an Electric Vehicle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In improving the efficiency of powertrain systems and ride comfort for electric vehicles (EVs), the transmission model is required to enable more accessible and more straightforward control of such vehicles. In this study, a wet-type, two-speed, dual-brake transmission system, as well as a new electromechanical clutch actuator, is presented for EVs. A new coordinated optimal shifting control strategy is then introduced to avoid sharp jerks during shifting processes in the transmission system. Based on a state-space model of the electromechanical clutch actuator and dual-brake transmission, we develop a linear quadratic regulator strategy by considering ride comfort and sliding friction work to obtain optimal control trajectories of the traction and shifting motors under model-based control. Simulations and bench tests are carried out to verify the performance of the proposed control laws. Results of the proposed coordinated control strategy show that noticeable improvements in terms of vehicle jerk and friction energy loss are achieved compared with an optimal control scheme only for the shifting motor as the input.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".