Computational Prediction and Experimental Validation of the Unique Molecular Mode of Action of Scoulerine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scoulerine is a natural compound that is known to bind to tubulin and has anti-mitotic properties demonstrated in various cancer cells. Its molecular mode of action has not been precisely known. In this work, we perform computational prediction and experimental validation of the mode of action of scoulerine. Based on the existing data in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and using homology modeling, we create human tubulin structures corresponding to both free tubulin dimers and tubulin in a microtubule. We then perform docking of the optimized structure of scoulerine and find the highest affinity binding sites located in both the free tubulin and in a microtubule. We conclude that binding in the vicinity of the colchicine binding site and near the laulimalide binding site are the most likely locations for scoulerine interacting with tubulin. Thermophoresis assays using scoulerine and tubulin in both free and polymerized form confirm these computational predictions. We conclude that scoulerine exhibits a unique property of a dual mode of action with both microtubule stabilization and tubulin polymerization inhibition, both of which have similar affinity values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".