MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283276164 · doi:10.20453/rnp.v85i2.4231

Inteligencia artificial en la evaluación y manejo de pacientes con epilepsia.

2022· article· es· W4283276164 on OpenAlexaff
Elma Paredes‐Aragón, Jorge G. Burneo

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Neuro-Psiquiatría · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesGynecologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La epilepsia es una enfermedad que frecuentemente conlleva significativos niveles de morbi-mortalidad, afecta seriamente la calidad de vida y, en cerca de un tercio de los pacientes, es refractaria a diversos tratamientos. La inteligencia artificial (IA) ha beneficiado el estudio, tratamiento y pronóstico de los pacientes con epilepsia a través de los años. Estos logros abarcan diagnóstico, predicción de crisis automatizada, monitoreo avanzado de crisis epilépticas y electroencefalograma, uso de recursos genéticos en manejo y diagnóstico, algoritmos en imagen y tratamiento, neuromodulación y cirugía robótica. La presente revisión explica de forma práctica los avances actuales y futuros de la inteligencia artificial, rama de la ciencia que ha mostrado resultados prometedores en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de pacientes con epilepsia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Neuro-PsiquiatríaSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207