MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283276597 · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2022.05.015

A stochastic optimization approach for the supply vessel planning problem under uncertain demand

2022· article· en· W4283276597 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Part B Methodological · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStochastic programmingMathematical optimizationScheduleRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceVehicle routing problemRobust optimizationColumn generationStochastic optimizationOperations researchEngineeringRouting (electronic design automation)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a two-stage stochastic programming with recourse methodology to solve the Supply Vessel Planning Problem with Stochastic Demands (SVPPSD), a problem arising in offshore logistics and which generalizes the Periodic Vehicle Routing Problem with Stochastic Demands and Time Windows. In the SVPPSD, a fleet of vessels is used to deliver a regular supply of commodities to a set of offshore installations to ensure continuous production, with each installation requiring one or more visits per week and having stochastic demands. Both the onshore depot where the product to be distributed is kept and the offshore installations have time windows, and voyages are allowed to span more than one day. A solution to the SVPPSD consists in the identification of an optimal fleet of vessels and the corresponding weekly schedule. As a solution methodology, we embed a discrete-event simulation engine within a genetic search procedure to approximate the cost of recourse and arrive at the minimized expected cost solution. We make comparisons with two alternative approaches: an expected value problem with upscaled demand, and a chance-constrained algorithm. While alternative methodologies yield robust schedules, robustness is achieved mainly through an increase in fleet size. In contrast, a two-stage stochastic programming with recourse algorithm, by accounting for the cost of recourse in the search phase, and exploring a wider solution space, allows arriving at robust schedules with a smaller fleet size, thereby yielding significant cost savings. For the tested problem instances, the proposed algorithm leads to savings of approximately 10 to 15 million USD per year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.389
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.037 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it