MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283320023 · doi:10.21144/wp22-07

Relative Price Shocks and Inflation

2022· article· en· W4283320023 on OpenAlexafffund
Francisco J. Ruge‐Murcia, Alexander L. Wolman

Bibliographic record

VenueFederal Reserve Bank of Richmond Working Papers · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEconomicsMonetary policyInflation (cosmology)New Keynesian economicsMonetary economicsRelative priceConsumption (sociology)EconometricsSupply shockAggregate demandOutput gapKeynesian economicsMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In ‡ation is determined by interaction between real factors and monetary policy.Among the most important real factors are shocks to the supply and demand for di¤erent components of the consumption basket.We use an estimated multi-sector New Keynesian model to decompose the behavior of U.S. in ‡ation into contributions from sectoral (or "relative price") shocks, monetary policy shocks, and aggregate real shocks.The model is estimated by maximum likelihood with U.S. data for the post-1994 period in which in ‡ation and the monetary policy regime appeared to be stable.In addition to providing a broad decomposition of in ‡ation behavior, we enlist the model to help us understand the in ‡ation shortfall from 2012 to 2019, and the dramatic in ‡ation movements during the COVID pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFederal Reserve Bank of Richmond Working PapersSame topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207