Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current, accepted theories in cosmology and quantum realms encompass observations that are not explained by the theory. A method to account for these observations is to suggest new, ad hoc additions to the theory. The ad hoc additions suggest the need for a paradigm shift to produce a simpler theory with broader scope and with a cause-effect physical interaction such as the Scalar Theory of Everything (STOE). Links to papers showing calculations and observational data comparison are found in Hodge, 2020, IntellectualArchive, Vol.9, No. 4, P. 14; DOI: 10.32370/IA_2020_12_3 ; See video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YlJGdTvuTU Inflation, negative energy, Dark Matter, action-at-a-distance, and Dark Energy are ad hoc additions to the Big Bang model of cosmology. Other problematic assumptions are spacetime, infinities, decreasing temperature, and increasing entropy of the universe. The strong force, weak force, and the orbits of electrons around a nucleus are ad hoc additions to the atomic models. Other problematic assumptions are the weird results from the assumption of the probabilistic nature of the universe and that the speed of light limits the speed of causality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".