Effective all-fiber pump recycler for kilowatt fiber lasers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report an effective pump recycler for industrial kilowatt fiber lasers. The pump recycler is a (6+1)×1 tapered fiber bundle, with signal ports of Ge-doped fiber (GDF) with core/cladding diameters of 20/400 µm and pump fiber ports (PFPs) with core/cladding diameters of 135/155 µm. By splicing PFPs in pairs, 77.9% of the residual pump light reaching the pump recycler is sent back to the cladding of the GDF. The insertion of a pump recycler increases the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of a fiber laser using an Yb-doped fiber (YDF) from 61.0% to 70.5%, with a maximum output power of 2.78 kW. The laser with a 20 m long YDF and pump recycler compares well to another laser using a 40 m long YDF without pump recycler. In both cases, the PCE is comparable but the laser with a 20 m long YDF and pump recycler benefits from reduced stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), thus enabling an 80% increase in Raman threshold. By giving access to short YDF length, the tapered fiber bundle represents an effective pump recycler since it enables reducing SRS while keeping a large PCE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".