MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283326338 · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002976

Power Output Manipulation from Below to Above the Gas Exchange Threshold Results in Exacerbated Performance Fatigability

2022· article· en· W4283326338 on OpenAlexaff
Callum G. Brownstein, Frederic Sabater Pastor, José Antonio López Mira, Juan M. Murias, Guillaume Y. Millet

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exerciseCyclingIntensity (physics)MedicinePhysical therapyCardiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAnimal scienceInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Performance fatigability is substantially greater when exercising in the severe- versus heavy-intensity domain. However, the relevance of the boundary between moderate- and heavy-intensity exercise, the gas exchange threshold (GET), to performance fatigability is unclear. This study compared alterations in neuromuscular function during work-matched exercise above and below the GET. METHODS: Seventeen male participants completed work-matched cycling for 90, 110, and 140 min at 110%, 90%, and 70% of the GET, respectively. Knee extensor isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), high-frequency doublets (Db100), low- to high-frequency doublet ratio (Db10:100), and voluntary activation were measured at baseline, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of task completion. During the initial baseline visit and after each constant work rate bout, ramp-incremental exercise was performed, and peak power output and oxygen uptake (V̇O 2peak ) were determined. RESULTS: After the 70% and 90% GET trials, similar reductions in MVC (-14% ± 6% and -14% ± 8%, respectively, P = 0.175) and Db100 (-7% ± 9% and -6% ± 9%, respectively, P = 0.431) were observed. However, for a given amount of work completed, reductions in MVC (-25% ± 15%, P = 0.008) and Db100 (-12% ± 8%, P = 0.029) were up to 2.6-fold greater during the 110% than the 90% GET trial. Peak power output and V̇O 2peak during ramp-incremental exercise were reduced by 7.0% ± 11.3% and 6.5% ± 9.3%, respectively, after the 110% GET trial relative to the baseline ramp ( P ≤ 0.015), with no changes after the moderate-intensity trials ( P ≥ 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of difference in fatigability between the trials at 70% and 90% GET, coupled with the greater fatigability at 110% relative to 90% GET, shows that exceeding the moderate- to heavy-intensity boundary has implications for performance fatigability, while also impairing maximal exercise performance capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicSports Performance and TrainingFrench-language works237,207