Cloxacillin‐induced acute vanishing bile duct syndrome: A case study and literature review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ductopenia is often regarded as a chronic process where ≥50% of portal tracts lack bile ducts, which is also known as vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS). One aetiology is drug-induced liver injury. Cloxacillin, an antistaphylococcal penicillin, typically causes "bland" cholestasis. We present the first case of cloxacillin-induced acute ductopenia or VBDS and a review of published cloxacillin-induced liver injuries. A 66-year-old woman with no prior liver disease, but known penicillin allergy, was treated for postcarotid angioplasty staphylococcal infection with 6 weeks of cloxacillin. She presented with a 2-week history of weakness and jaundice. Laboratory work-up showed elevated liver enzymes with a cholestatic pattern, hyperbilirubinemia and eosinophilia. She required ICU transfer for hypotension and was started empirically on prednisone. Liver biopsy revealed severe centrilobular cholestasis, mild necroinflammation and ductopenia with epithelial injury, but no ductular reaction. Two months later she was discharged on hydrocortisone and ursodiol with persistently elevated alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin. She was considered for liver transplantation but died of liver failure 4 months later. Four additional articles were found with histopathologic descriptions of cloxacillin-related liver injury. These included portal inflammation, cholestasis and mild necroinflammation. Clinical features were reported in two cases; both had mild symptoms with cholestatic liver enzymes and hyperbilirubinemia. Both patients recovered completely within 10-60 days. Cloxacillin-induced cholestasis can be secondary to acute ductopenia, which can result in worse clinical outcomes than previously described "bland" cholestasis. Liver biopsy is recommended to identify cases with acute VBDS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.019 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".