Sunset similarity solution for a receding hydraulic fracture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper derives approximate ‘sunset’ similarity solutions for receding plane strain and radially symmetric hydraulic fractures in permeable elastic media close to the point of closure. Local analysis is used to show that a receding hydraulic fracture has a linear aperture asymptote $\hat {w}\sim \hat {s}$ in the fracture tip, where $\hat {s}$ is the distance from the fracture front. Due to the regularity of the linear asymptote, it is possible to determine similarity solutions in the form of power series expansions, which, for integers $N\ge 2$ and values of the radius decay exponent $\gamma =1/N$ , can be shown to terminate to yield polynomial solutions for the fracture aperture of degree $N$ . Of this countable infinity of polynomial solutions, the final aperture profile as the fracture approaches closure is associated with the second-degree polynomial with $\gamma =1/2$ called the sunset solution. For the reverse time $t^{\prime }$ measured from closure, the sunset solution is characterized by $w\sim t^{\prime }$ and $R\sim t^{\prime 1/2}$ . Of all the admissible polynomial similarity solutions, the sunset solution is shown to form an attractor, as $t^{\prime }\rightarrow 0$ , for receding hydraulic fractures associated with a wide variety of points in parametric space. Using the sunset solution, it is possible to estimate the duration of recession, assuming that the fracture aperture and radius at the start of recession are given, and determine how it scales with a dimensionless shut-in parameter. As the fracture approaches closure, the term responsible for coupling the elastic force balance and fluid conservation becomes subdominant to the other terms in the lubrication equation, which reduces to a local kinematic relation between the decaying fracture aperture and the leak-off velocity. This fundamental decoupling of dynamics from kinematics results in the sunset solution being dependent on only a single material parameter – namely the leak-off coefficient. This isolation of the leak-off coefficient by the sunset solution opens the possibility to determine this parameter from laboratory or field measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".